The effect of full-error and error-less training and skill level on the development of mental representation of golf skill

Authors

kharazmi university

Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of training type (full-error and error-less) and skill level on the development of mental representation of putt golf skill. For this purpose, 44 undergraduate physical education students (22 women, 22 men; mean age 22.34 and standard deviation 4.37) were randomly divided into two groups: error-less (near-to-far) and full-error (far-to-near). The two groups practiced in the one-day acquisition phase of 3 blocks of 10 attempts for throwing distances (25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 and 200 cm). The error-less group started training from the closest distance to the goal and reached the farthest distance, respectively, but the full-error group started training from the farthest distance and finally reached the closest distance. At the end, they were tested immediately. One day after the acquisition phase, delayed retention tests, single task transfer (from a distance of 225 cm) and dual task transfer (from a distance of 200 cm simultaneously with audio playback) were performed. To compare the effect of error-less and full-error training on the acquisition, retention and transfer of putt golf skills, data analysis of the acquisition stage was analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (2×8). SDA-M test was used to measure the structure of mental representations formed in the two groups before and after the acquisition period, and hierarchical cluster analysis 0.05) was used to analyze the mental representations. Our Findings showed significant functional changes in the post-exercise mental representation structure, suggesting that motor skills are associated with functional adaptation of action-related knowledge in long-term memory.

Keywords


1. Magill RA, Anderson DI. Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. 9 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2010.
2. Green TD, Flowers JH. Implicit versus explicit learning processes in a probabilistic, continuous fine-motor catching task. Journal of motor behavior. 1991;23(4):293-300.
3. Adams JA. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of motor behavior. 1971;3(2):111-50.
4. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological review. 1975;82(4):225.
5. Masters R, Maxwell J. The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2008;1(2):160-83.
6. Baddeley A, Wilson BA. When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia. 1994;32(1):53-68.
7. Baddeley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation. 8: Elsevier; 1974. p. 47-89.
8. Poolton J, Masters R, Maxwell J. The influence of analogy learning on decision-making in table tennis: Evidence from behavioural data. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2006;7(6):677-88.
9. Schack T, Mechsner F. Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory. Neuroscience Letters. 2006;391(3):77-81.
10. Frank C, Land WM, Schack T. Perceptual-cognitive changes during motor learning: The influence of mental and physical practice on mental representation, gaze behavior, and performance of a complex action. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6:1981.
11. Frank C, Land WM, Schack T. Mental representation and learning: The influence of practice on the development of mental representation structure in complex action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2013;14(3):353-61.
12. Land WM, Frank C, Schack T. The influence of attentional focus on the development of skill representation in a complex action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2014;15(1):30-8.
13. Schack T. The relationship between motor representation and biomechanical parameters in complex movements: towards an integrative perspective of movement science. European Journal of Sport Science. 2003;3(2):1-13.
14. Masters RSW. Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology. 1992;83(3):343-58.
15. Maxwell J, Masters R, Kerr E, Weedon E. The implicit benefit of learning without errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2001;54(4):1049-68.
16. Maxwell JP, Capio CM, Masters RS. Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: application of implicit and explicit approaches. European journal of sport science. 2017;17(4):407-16.
17. Capio CM, Sit CH, Abernethy B, Masters RS. The possible benefits of reduced errors in the motor skills acquisition of children. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology. 2012;4(1):1.
18. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach: Human kinetics; 2008.
19. Schack T. Measuring mental representations. Measurement in sport and exercise psychology. 2012;8:203-14.
20. Schack T. The cognitive architecture of complex movement. International journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2004;2(4):403-38.
21. Chase WG, Simon HA. Perception in chess. Cognitive psychology. 1973;4(1):55-81.
22. Schack T. The Cognitive Architecture of Motion. In: Mornell A, editor. Art in Motion-Musical & Athletic Motor Learning & Performance. Frankfurt/ Main: Peter Lang; 2009. p. 161-87.
23. Allard F, Burnett N. Skill in sport. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie. 1985;39(2):294.
24. Chi MT, Rees ET. A learning framework for development. Contributions to human development. 1983;9:71-107.
25. French KE, Thomas JR. The Relation off Knowledge Development to Children's Basketball Performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1987;9(1):15-32.
26. Groot Ad. Thought and Choice in Chess (ed. GW Baylor) Translated from the Dutch version from 1946. Second. Mouton Publishers, The Hague; 1965.
27. Beilock SL, Wierenga SA, Carr TH. Memory and expertise: What do experienced athletes remember. Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise. 2003:295-320.
28. Beilock SL, Wierenga SA, Carr TH. Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2002;55(4):1211-40.
29. Beilock SL, Carr TH. On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of experimental psychology: General. 2001;130(4):701.
30. Masters RS, Maxwell JP. 10 Implicit motor learning, reinvestment and movement disruption. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. 2004:207.
31. Masters RS. Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British journal of psychology. 1992;83(3):343-58.
32. Weigelt M, Ahlmeyer T, Lex H, Schack T. The cognitive representation of a throwing technique in judo experts–technological ways for individual skill diagnostics in high-performance sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2011;12(3):231-5.
33. Velentzas K, Heinen T, Tenenbaum G, Schack T. Functional mental representation of volleyball routines in German youth female national players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2010;22(4):474-85.
34. Schack T. Building blocks and architecture of dance. In: Bläsing B, Puttke M, Schack T, editors. The Neurocognition of Dance: Mind, Movement and Motor Skills: Psychology Press; 2010. p. 11.
35. Bläsing B, Tenenbaum G, Schack T. The cognitive structure of movements in classical dance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2009;10(3):350-60.
36. Bläsing B, Schack T, Brugger P. The functional architecture of the human body: assessing body representation by sorting body parts and activities. Experimental Brain Research. 2010;203(1):119-29.
37. Stöckel T, Hughes CM, Schack T. Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children. Psychological research.76-768(6)76;2012.
38. Sanli EA, Lee TD. What roles do errors serve in motor skill learning? An examination of two theoretical predictions. Journal of motor behavior. 2014;46(5):329-37.
39. Poolton J, Masters R, Maxwell J. The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Human movement science. 2005;24(3):362-78.
40. Post PG, Fairbrother JT, Barros JA. Self-controlled amount of practice benefits learning of a motor skill. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2011;82(3):474-81.
41. Payne VG, Isaacs LD. Human motor development: A lifespan approach: Routledge; 2017.
42. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2007;78(2):40-7.
43. Hemayattalab R. Effects of self-control and instructor-control feedback on motor learning in individuals with cerebral palsy. Research in developmental disabilities. 2014;35(11):2766-72.
44. Feltz DL, Landers DM, Becker BJ. A revised meta-analysis of the mental practice literature on motor skill learning1988.
45. Caliński T, Harabasz J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods. 1974;3(1):1-27.
46. Santos JM, Embrechts M, editors. On the use of the adjusted rand index as a metric for evaluating supervised classification. International conference on artificial neural networks; 2009: Springer.
47. Sanli EA. The role of minimization and facilitation of learner involvement during acquisition in the learning of a motor task 2013.
48. Schack T. Measuring Mental Representations. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC, Kamata A, editors. Measurement in sport and exercise psychology Human Kinetics; 2012. p. 203-14
49. Schack T. Knowledge and performance in action. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2004;8(4):38-53.
50. Frank C, Schack T. The Representation of Motor (Inter)action, States of Action, and Learning: Three Perspectives on Motor Learning by Way of Imagery and Execution. Front Psychol. 2017;8:678.
51. Frank C, Land WM, Popp C, Schack T. Mental representation and mental practice: experimental investigation on the functional links between motor memory and motor imagery. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95175.
52. Land WM, Volchenkov D, Blasing BE, Schack T. From action representation to action execution: exploring the links between cognitive and biomechanical levels of motor control. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2013;7:127.
53. Hardy L, Mullen R, Jones G. Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress. British Journal of psychology. 1996;87(4):621-36.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 October 2020