Manuscript Review and Peer-Review Process

Manuscript Review and Peer-Review Process

The Research in Sports Management and Motor Behavior journal is committed to keeping pace with international publishing standards and is based on the principles of peer review and open access. Accordingly, the journal employs a double-blind peer-review process, in which neither the authors are informed of the reviewers’ identities nor the reviewers are informed of the identities of the authors. This ensures that manuscripts are evaluated solely on their scientific merit and free from prejudice, bias, or personal considerations. Manuscripts submitted through the journal's online system are sent for peer review if they are consistent with the journal's scope and meet the standards established for review. Following the final approval of the Editor-in-Chief, accepted manuscripts proceed to the publication process.

The Research in Sports Management and Motor Behavior journal is committed to the highest standards of peer review and scholarly evaluation. In accordance with publication ethics, the journal follows the rules, policies, and guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and adheres to the applicable regulations concerning the prevention of and response to academic misconduct and scientific fraud. The journal follows the relevant COPE procedures when dealing with potential cases of misconduct or article retraction.

All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer-review process to ensure the quality of their methodology and scientific reasoning. After a manuscript is submitted through the journal's online management system, it is initially reviewed by the journal office, the journal's expert, and the Editor-in-Chief, normally within a maximum of one week. Authors are therefore requested to carefully read the journal's instructions and Author Guidelines, prepare their manuscripts in accordance with the requirements specified in the Persian-language guidelines, and then submit them through the online system. Following the initial assessment by the Executive Editor, manuscripts that receive preliminary approval from the Editor-in-Chief are forwarded to qualified reviewers for evaluation and peer review.

Submitted manuscripts are initially screened for compliance with the journal's formatting and writing requirements and for relevance to the journal's aims and scope. At this stage, the author is informed whether the manuscript has been approved for peer review and is also notified regarding the payment of the peer-review fee.

Review, Acceptance, and Publication Stages

  1. Manuscript Submission and Acknowledgement
    The manuscript is submitted through the journal's website, and an acknowledgement of receipt is sent to the author.
  2. Initial Technical and Formatting Check
    The manuscript is reviewed for compliance with the journal's formatting requirements and the Author Guidelines.
  3. Assignment to the Editor-in-Chief
    The manuscript is forwarded to the Editor-in-Chief for the selection and appointment of appropriate reviewers.
  4. Payment of the Peer-Review Fee
    A notification requesting payment of the peer-review fee is sent to the author.
  5. Peer Review
    The manuscript is sent to at least two to three reviewers for scientific evaluation.
  6. Reviewers' Recommendations
    The reviewers' recommendations generally fall into three categories:
    • a. Rejection
    • b. Acceptance
    • c. Revision
  7. Communication of Reviewers' Comments
    The reviewers' comments and recommendations are sent to the author for consideration and revision.
  8. Submission of the Revised Manuscript
    The revised manuscript is submitted by the author after addressing the reviewers' comments.
  9. Comparative Review of Revisions
    The revised manuscript is returned to the reviewers for comparative evaluation. The possible outcomes are:
    • a. Revisions not approved: The manuscript is rejected.
    • b. Acceptance: The revisions are approved and the manuscript is accepted.
    • c. Further revisions requested: Additional revisions are requested by the reviewer and the manuscript is returned to the author for further correction.
  10. Final Editorial Evaluation
    If the revisions are approved, the manuscript is referred to the relevant editorial authority of the journal for final evaluation.
  11. Payment of the Publication Fee
    Following final approval, a notification requesting payment of the publication fee is sent to the author.
  12. Issuance of the Acceptance Letter
    After the publication fee has been paid, the official acceptance letter is issued and sent to the author or authors via email.