Research in Sports Management and Movement Behavior

The Underlying Causes of the Management of the Relationship between Physical Education Faculties and Sports Science and the Executive Branch of the Sports Industry and the Presentation of the Model

Articles in Press

Authors

Vahid Saatchian
Farideh Hadavi
Hossein Akbari Yazdi
Bahador Azizi
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to provide a model of the underlying causes of the management of the relationship between physical education faculties and sport science and the executive branch of the sports industry. In order to collect information, deep interviews with the elite were conducted on the topic of research. Sampling was conducted purposefully and snowball method. Finally, 18 qualitative interviews were conducted. The findings were analyzed through coding method in three stages: open, axial and selective. The findings revealed 59 effective signs in the relationship management of faculties and the executive branch of the sports industry. These labels were categorized in 14 concepts including knowledge, organizational culture, government look, industrial thinking, scientific thinking, human resources, ethical aspects, trust / mediation unit, parallel management, laws and regulations, Media, capacity building, competitive space and communication management. Finally, the research model emerged from five main categories including culture, marketing, environment, insight, and trans-organization powers. According to the findings of the research, there are some executive strategies that can be used by sports managers in relation to the scientific management of the relationship between sports organizations.

Keywords

sport Industry
University and Industry Collaboration
Physical Education and Sport Science College
Executive Part of Sport Industry
فهرست منابع
1. Alizadeh, M., Elahi, A. (2008). Developing the strategic planning of sport science research in Iran. Research study, SSrc. (Persian).
2. Asgarian, F. (2005). Investigation the economical approach of Iran Sport Industry since 1998 to 2000. Harakat Journal, 25-44. (Persian).
3. Bazargan, A. (2012). Introduction to qualitative and mixed methods research: general approach to Behavioral Sciences. Humanities and Cultural Studies Institute. (Persian).
4. Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the actors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39, Issue 7, 858-868.
5. De Fuentes, C., Dutrénit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction or long-term beneit. Research Policy, In Press, Corrected Proo, and Available online 16 April 2012.
6. Esham, M. (2008). Strategies to develop University-Industry linkages in Sri Lanka. National Education Commission Sri Lanka.
7. Faez, A., Shahabi, A. (2010). Assess and prioritize barriers to university-industry relations (Semnan case study). Leadership and Educational Management, 4, 97-124. (Persian).
8. Fiuzat, E., Taslimi, R. (2007). Sociological research of Relation between University and Indusry in Iran Today. Human Science, 53, 129-150. (Persian).
9. Hamidi Zade, M. (2012). Designing and developing the extension models of communication with industry. Education of Iran Engineering, 37, 22-37. (Persian).
10. Kotler, P. (2012). Marketing management, 14th, Pearson Education.
11. Parks, J., Beverly, T., Quarterman, J. (2010). Contemporary Sport Management. Human Kinetic, 4th Edition.
12. Poursoltani, H. (2010). Identification and Codifying Ethical Standards for Iran Academic Membres of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Ssrc research. (Persian).
13. Ramos-Vielba, I., Ernández-Esquinas, M., De-los-Monteros, E, E. (2010). Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Akade´miai Kiado´, Budapest.
14. Rosly, O., Ahmad Fairuz O. (2012). University and industry collaboration: towards a successful and sustainable partnership. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 575 – 579.
15. Saatchian, V. (2011). Marketing barriers of attraction and development of sport fan for Iran pro league. Kharazmi University Thesis. (Persian).
16. Salter A, Bruneel, J. (2009). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration.Conference on CBS – Copenhagen Business School.
17. Sayadi, E., Sharifian, E., Tabrizi, K. (2012). Identification and prioritization the barriers of relation between the manufacturing sector of the sport industry and universities in Iran. International Journal of Sport Studies, 2 (5), 243-249. (Persian).
18. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Ischer, M. M., Röhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303–328.
19. Shafie, M. (2006). Comparative Investigation the relationship between university and industry in developed and developing societies. 9th congress of government, Industry and University Corporation, Tehran. (Persian).
20. Stone, D. (2013). Inter-organizational relationship between university and industry: an overview. University of New Brunswick.
21. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (2012). Basic of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory, Procedures and Techniques. 12th, Sage Publication.
22. Systematical Comprehensive of development the sport research in Iran. (2012). Iran Sport Database, http://www.peonews.com/d_nezam.asp.
23. Xia, A., Jin, W. (2012). On the actors that Aect the Proneness o University- Industry Cooperation: a System Engineering Perspective. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 275- 281.
Research in Sports Management and Movement Behavior

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 October 2020