The relationship between Participation Motivation in sport and socioeconomic status of youth in Tehran

Authors

Assistant Professor, Sport Science Department, Faculty of Social Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract
Background and purpose: This study was conducted to determine Relationship between participation motivation and Social – Economic Status of youth in Tehran. Method: This study was cross-sectional and done by questionnaire. The analyses were based on data that collected from sports clubs in four Tehran regions (North, South, East and West), (n= 130) young people (65 male, 65 female) were selected randomly and completed the participation motivation questionnaire (PMQ) and socioeconomic status questionnaire. Result: results of Pearson’s correlation showed that there was a significant positive relationship between motivational component subscales of participation motivation in sport and socioeconomic status in young people (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The present study determined there was a significant relationship between income statues, economic-class, parents’ education level and sport participation motivation. The finding revealed that the families with high-and middle- economic class and income have a greater incentive to engage in physical activity. The education level of parents, especially fathers play an important role in encouraging their children to participate in physical activities.

Keywords


1. Ghodrat Nama A, Heiydari Nejad S, Davoodi I. Relationship between socioeconomic status and physical activity of students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Journal of sport management. 2013; 5(16):S5-S20. (in persian).
2. Drenowatz C, Eisenmann JC, Pfeiffer KA, Welk G, Heelan K, Gentile D, et al. Influence of socio-economic status on habitual physical activity and sedentary behavior in 8-to 11-year old children. BMC public health. 2010;10(1):214.
3. Enshel M H. The psychology of sport from theory to practice.2002; translate by Mosaded A A (in persian).
4. Fuladian J, Sohrabi M, Attarzadeh H R, Farsi A. The Relationship between Sport Participation Motivation and Sport Orientation of Athletic Students. olampic season. 2010. 4. 29-39. (in persian).
5. Johnston LD, Delva J, O’Malley PM. Sports participation and physical education in American secondary schools: current levels and racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities. American journal of preventive medicine. 2007;33(4):S195-S208.
6. Piko BF, Fitzpatrick KM. Socioeconomic status, psychosocial health and health behaviours among Hungarian adolescents. The European Journal of Public Health. 2007;17(4):353-60.
7. Piko BF, Keresztes N. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic variations in leisure time physical activity in a sample of Hungarian youth. International journal of public health. 2008;53(6):306-10.
8. Powell LM, Slater S, Chaloupka FJ. The relationship between community physical activity settings and race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Evidence-Based Preventive Medicine. 2004;1(2):135-44.
9. Nbavi A H, Hosein Zadeh A H, hosseini H. The effect of socioeconomic status and ethnic identity on social security. 2010.10(2). 9-19.
10. Nouebakhsh S H P, Mazaheri E. A COMPARISON OF PARTICIPATION MOTIVATION IN SPORT ACTIVITIES IN SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY BOY STUDENT ATHLETES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SPORT GOAL ORIENTATIONS. 2006. (in Persian).
11. Zahariadis PN, Biddle SJ. Goal orientations and participation motives in physical education and sport: Their relationships in English schoolchildren. Athletic Insight: the Online Journal of Sports Psychology. 2000;2(1):1-12.
12. Benar N, Loghmani M. Comparison between sport participation motivation and goal-orientation of youth athletes: the role of parents' education level.. 2012(12).
13. Razavi M H. Teheri O R. Investigation of socio-economic status of individuals participating in public sport activities in Mazandaran province. 2011, 5, 21-34. (in persian).
14. Duncan M, Woodfield L, Al‐Nakeeb Y, Nevill 1 A. The impact of socio‐economic status on the physical activity levels of British Secondary School Children. European Journal of Physical Education. 2002;7(1):30-44.
15. Ball K, Salmon J, Giles-Corti B, Crawford D. How can socio-economic differences in physical activity among women be explained? A qualitative study. Women & health. 2006;43(1):93-113.
16. Sudano JJ, Baker DW. Explaining US racial/ethnic disparities in health declines and mortality in late middle age: the roles of socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and health insurance. Social science & medicine. 2006;62(4):909-22.
17. Brown JV, Rusinova NL, editors. Socioeconomic status and health-related lifestyle strategies in st. petersburg, Russia. University of Texas–Austin University at the conference on heath, institutions and cultures in the former soviet sphere; 2007.
18. Kanters MA, Bocarro JN, Edwards MB, Casper JM, Floyd MF. School sport participation under two school sport policies: comparisons by race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status. Annals of behavioral medicine. 2012;45(suppl_1):S113-S21.
19. Pulsford RM, Griew P, Page AS, Cooper AR, Hillsdon MM. Socioeconomic position and childhood sedentary time: evidence from the PEACH project. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2013;10(1):105.
20. Gill DL, Gross JB, Huddleston S. Participation motivation in youth sports. International journal of sport psychology. 1983.
21. Shafi Zadeh M. Validity and Reliability of the Sport Participation Motivation Questionnaire. 2005. (in persian).
22. Kantomaa MT, Tammelin TH, Näyhä S, Taanila AM. Adolescents' physical activity in relation to family income and parents' education. Preventive medicine. 2007;44(5):410-5.
23. Jafari Gh. Relationship between socioeconomic status of family and motor skills of third grade elementary school students in Khawaf .1995. Master Thesis. (in persian).
24. Shi Z, Lien N, Kumar BN, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Physical activity and associated socio-demographic factors among school adolescents in Jiangsu Province, China. Preventive medicine. 2006;43(3):218-21.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 October 2020