A Scientometric Analysis of a Decade of Research on Focus of Attention in Children (2013–2023): Patterns, Trends, and Gaps

Author

Allameh Tabataba,i

Abstract


Abstract

Introduction : The present study aims to analyze research articles from the past decade in the field of attentional focus among children and adolescents using a scientometric approach.

Methods: This descriptive and review-based study utilized a specific search strategy in the Web of Science (WoS) citation database. A total of 29 relevant articles on attentional focus published between 2013 and 2023 were selected and analyzed using HistCite and VOSviewer software.

Resultss: The findings revealed that the main research topics included motor performance, motor learning, and motor control, with a predominant emphasis on external focus of attention. Moreover, research attention toward adolescents was found to be lower compared to children. The most active journals in this field were Human Movement Science and Psychology of Sport and Exercise. Prominent authors such as Wulf, Abdollahipour, and Pesta received the highest number of scientific citations. In terms of international collaboration, countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia were leading, with the U.S. showing strong connections with Iran and the Czech Republic, playing a key role in scientific networks.

Conclusion: The results indicate that the role of attentional focus instructions in motor learning and performance particularly in children and adolescents is an emerging and evolving area. However, attentional instructions in these age groups, who possess developing cognitive characteristics, have been understudied so far. This analysis emphasizes that enhancing international collaboration and focusing on existing research gaps can pave the way for future investigations.

Keywords: Sports performance, children and adolescents, cognitive development, attentional strategies, scientometric study



Abstract

Introduction : The present study aims to analyze research articles from the past decade in the field of attentional focus among children and adolescents using a scientometric approach.

Methods: This descriptive and review-based study utilized a specific search strategy in the Web of Science (WoS) citation database. A total of 29 relevant articles on attentional focus published between 2013 and 2023 were selected and analyzed using HistCite and VOSviewer software.

Resultss: The findings revealed that the main research topics included motor performance, motor learning, and motor control, with a predominant emphasis on external focus of attention. Moreover, research attention toward adolescents was found to be lower compared to children. The most active journals in this field were Human Movement Science and Psychology of Sport and Exercise. Prominent authors such as Wulf, Abdollahipour, and Pesta received the highest number of scientific citations. In terms of international collaboration, countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia were leading, with the U.S. showing strong connections with Iran and the Czech Republic, playing a key role in scientific networks.

Conclusion: The results indicate that the role of attentional focus instructions in motor learning and performance particularly in children and adolescents is an emerging and evolving area. However, attentional instructions in these age groups, who possess developing cognitive characteristics, have been understudied so far. This analysis emphasizes that enhancing international collaboration and focusing on existing research gaps can pave the way for future investigations.

Keywords: Sports performance, children and adolescents, cognitive development, attentional strategies, scientometric study


Keywords


1. van Abswoude F, Nuijen NB, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B. Individual differences influencing immediate effects of internal and external focus instructions on children’s motor performance. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2018;89(2):190–9.DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1442915
2. Jarus T, Ratzon NZ. The implementation of motor learning principles in designing prevention programs at work. Work. 2005;24(2):171–82DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2005-00414
3. Pachpute S, Sawant Y, Saini S. Effect of focus of attention on motor skills acquisition, retention and transfer in children. J Phys Ther Sports Med 2022; 6 (4): 1. 4:3.DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060174
4. Kal EC, Van der Kamp J, Houdijk H. External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Human movement science. 2013;32(4):527–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.04.001
5. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2013;6(1):77–104.doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728
6. Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2001;54(4):1143–54.DOI: 10.1080/713756012
7. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Human kinetics; 2023.
8. van Der Fels IMJ, Smith J, De Bruijn AGM, Bosker RJ, Königs M, Oosterlaan J, et al. Relations between gross motor skills and executive functions, controlling for the role of information processing and lapses of attention in 8-10 year old children. PloS one. 2019;14(10):e0224219.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224219

9. Schmitt SA, McClelland MM, Tominey SL, Acock AC. Strengthening school readiness for Head Start children: Evaluation of a self-regulation intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2015;30:20–31.10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.08.001.
10. Abdollahipour R, Wulf G, Psotta R, Palomo Nieto M. Performance of gymnastics skill benefits from an external focus of attention. Journal of sports sciences. 2015;33(17):1807–13.DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1012102
11. Brocken JEA, Kal EC, Van der Kamp J. Focus of attention in children’s motor learning: Examining the role of age and working memory. Journal of motor behavior. 2016;48(6):527–34. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1152224
12. Ugalde V, Brockman C, Bailowitz Z, Pollard CD. Single Leg Squat Test and Its Relationship to Dynamic KneeValgus and Injury Risk Screening. PM and R. 2015;7(3):229–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.08.361
13. Flores FS, Schild JFG, Chiviacowsky S. Benefits of external focus instructions on the learning of a balance task in children of different ages. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2015;46(4):311–20.DOI: 10.7352/IJSP.2015.46.311
14. Chow JY, Koh M, Davids K, Button C, Rein R. Effects of different instructional constraints on task performance and emergence of coordination in children. European journal of sport science. 2014;14(3):224–32.DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2013.780097
15. Emanuel M, Jarus T, Bart O. Effect of focus of attention and age on motor acquisition, retention, and transfer: a randomized trial. Physical therapy. 2008;88(2):251–60.https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060174
16. Kal EC, Van Der Kamp J, Houdijk H, Groet E, Van Bennekom CAM, Scherder EJA. Stay focused! The effects of internal and external focus of attention on movement automaticity in patients with stroke. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0136917.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136917
17. Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Raab M. Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing? Journal of sports sciences. 2006;24(1):89–99.
18. Buszard T, Reid M, Krause L, Kovalchik S, Farrow D. Quantifying contextual interference and its effect on skill transfer in skilled youth tennis players. Frontiers in psychology. 2017;8:1931.
19. Buszard T, Farrow D, Zhu FF, Masters RSW. Examining movement specific reinvestment and working memory capacity in adults and children. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2013; 44(44):351-366.

20. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and cognition. 2003;12(3):376–402. doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00005-9.DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003.
21. Alloway TP, Alloway RG. Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of experimental child psychology. 2010;106(1):20–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003
22. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2016;23:1382–414.DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9.
23. Masters R, Maxwell J. The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2008;1(2):160–83.doi.org/10.1080/17509840802287218
24. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2007;78(2):40–7.DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599402
25. Perreault ME, French KE. Differences in children’s thinking and learning during attentional focus instruction. Human movement science. 2016;45:154–60.DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.013
26. Song J-H. The role of attention in motor control and learning. Current opinion in psychology. 2019;29:261–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.002
27. Wulf G, Prinz W. Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2001;8(4):648–60. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196201
28. Ansorge L. Bibliometric Studies as a Publication Strategy. In: Metrics. MDPI; 2024. p. 5.doi.org/10.3390/metrics1010005
29. Gholampour, B., Gholampour, S., & Noruzi, A. (2022). Research trend analysis of information science in France based on total, cited and uncited publications: A scientometric and altmetric analysis. Informology, 1(1), 7-26
30. Gholampour, S., Gholampour, B., Elahi, A., Noruzi, A., Saboury, A. A., Hassan, S. U., Ahmed, F., Nawaz, R., & Terason, S. (2023). From mega-events hosting to scientific leadership: A seven-decade scientometric analysis of pioneer countries. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2210398.‌ https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2210398
31. Gholampour, B., Noruzi, A., Elahi, A., Barranco Gil, D., & Gholampour, S. (2024). Who are the key figures in Grand Tours cycling events publications? A systematic review of main themes. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.‌ https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-12-2023-0472
32. Salsali M, Sheikhhoseini R, Pooraghaei Ardekani Z. Association between Physical Activity and Exercise with Cognitive Function: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System. 2024;12(3):236–50.doi.org/10.30476/jhsss.2023.99217.1792
33. Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research. EMBO reports. 2014;15(12):1228–32.DOI: 10.3233/BMR-130420.
34. Pesta B, Fuerst J, Kirkegaard EOW. Bibliometric keyword analysis across seventeen years (2000–2016) of intelligence articles. Journal of Intelligence. 2018;6(4):46.DOI: 10.3233/BMR-130420
35. Cobo MJ, López‐Herrera AG, Herrera‐Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology. 2011;62(7):1382–402.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
36. Rasmussen E, Atkins HB, Borner K, McCain KW. Visualizing knowledge domains. Sponsored by SIG CR, SIG VIS. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2002;39(1):476–7.DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450390168
37. Chen C, Dubin R, Schultz T. Science mapping. Encyclopedia of information science and technology, Hershey. Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2014.DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch410

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 October 2020