The Role of Motor Learning Strategies in the Experience of flow and Clutch beginner footballers: A Mix Study

Authors

1 Department Of Sport Science, School Of Humanities, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran.

2 Kharazmi university of tehran

3 University of Tabriz

Abstract
The purpose of present study was to investigate the role of motor learning strategies (linear, non-linear, and differential) in the experience of flow and clutch in beginner footballers. Participants (66, M age= 27.49 and SD =2.68) participated in this study voluntarily and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants practiced in three groups: linear, nonlinear, and differential, for three months, two sessions each week and each session one and a half hours. The study method was quantitative and qualitative. In the quantitative part, flow and clutch questionnaire was used and in the qualitative part a semi-structured interview was used. The results of Tukey showed nonlinear pedagogy was effective in flow experience and linear method in clutch experience (p<0.05). In the differential learning, flow was experienced more than linear method (p<0.05) and less than non-linear method (p>0.05). In the qualitative part, four factors of purpose, pleasure, effort and exploration are identified that support the results of the quantitative part. Based on the results of this study, nonlinear and differential methods are effective in the flow experience and linear method are effective in the clutch experience.

Keywords


1. Schmidt RA, Lee T, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik H. Motor Control and Learning‌. Hum Kinet. 2018;6E.
2. Renshaw I, Oldham A, Bawden M. Nonlinear pedagogy underpins intrinsic motivation in sports coaching‌. Open Sports Sci J. 2012;5:88–99.
3. Renshaw I, Davids K, Savelsbergh G. Motor Learning in Practice: A Constraints-led Approach. London: Routledge. 2010;
4. Swann C, Jackman PC, Schweickle MJ, Vella SA. Optimal experiences in exercise: A qualitative investigation of flow and clutch states. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;40:87–98.
5. Swann C, Crust2 L, Vella1 S. New directions in the psychology of optimal performance in sport: flow and clutch states. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;16:48–53.
6. Swann C, Crust L, Jackman P, Vella S, Allen M, Keegan R. Psychological states underlying excellent performance in sport: Towards an integrated model of flow and clutch states. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2018;10.1080/10.
7. Swann C, Keegan R, Crust L, Piggott D. Psychological states underlying excellent performance in professional golfers: “Letting it happen” vs. “making it happen. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2016;23:101–13.
8. Swann C, Crust L, Jackman P, Vella SA, Allen MS, Keegan R. Performing under pressure: Exploring the psychological state underlying clutch performance in sport. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(23):2272–80.
9. Krane V, Williams J. Psychological characteristics of peak performance. In J. M. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance (5th ed., pp.207-227). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 2006;
10. Anderson R, Hanrahan S, Mallett C. Investigating the optimal psychological state for peak performance in Australian elite athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2014;26:318–33.
11. Jackman PC, Swann C, Crust L. Exploring athletes’ perceptions of the relationship between mental toughness and dispositional flow in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2016;27:56–65.
12. Renshaw I, Chow JY, Davids K, Button C. Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction. Routledge; 2015.
13. Chow JY. Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: evidence, challenges, and implications. Quest. 2013;65(4):469–84.
14. I Schollhorn W, Hegen P, Davids K. The nonlinear nature of learning-A differential learning approach. Open Sports Sci J. 2012;5(1).
15. Santos S, Coutinho D, Gonçalves B, Schöllhorn W, Sampaio J, Leite N. Differential learning as a key training approach to improve creative and tactical behavior in soccer‌. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018;89(1):11–24.
16. Savelsbergh GJP, Kamper WJ, Rabius J, De Koning JJ, Schöllhorn W. A new method to learn to start in speed skating: A differencial learning approach. Int J Sport Psychol. 2010;41(4):415.
17. Bozkurt S. The Effects of Differential Learning and Traditional Learning Trainings on Technical Development of Football Players. J Educ Train Stud. 2018;6:25–9.
18. Bernstein N. The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press London. 1967;
19. Santos S, Jiménez S, Sampaio J, Leite N. Effects of the Skills4Genius sports-based training program in creative behavior. PLoS One, 12, e0172520. 2017;
20. Yaali R, Teymoori N, Bagheri S. The effect of Training Method (Linear and Nonlinear) on Students̓ Participation Motivation in Physical Education Class. Sport Psychol Stud. 2019;7880.1850. (In persian)
21. Moy B, Renshaw I, Davids K. The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2016;21(5):517–38.
22. VaezMousavi M. The Relationships among Social-contextual Environments, Motivation, Enjoyment and Satisfaction in Physical Education Class, Based on Self-dertemination Theory. Sport Psychol Stud. 2019;8(28):13–26. (In persian)
23. Schweickle M, Groves S, Vella SA, Swann C. The effects of open vs. specific goals on flow and clutch states in a cognitive task. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017;33:45–54.
24. Swann C, Crust L, Jackman P, Vella SA, Allen MS, Keegan R. Psychological states underlying excellent performance in sport: Toward an integrated model of flow and clutch states‌. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2017;29(4):375–401.
25. Greenwood D, Davids K, Renshaw I. Experiential knowledge of expert coaches can help identify informational constraints on performance of dynamic interceptive actions. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(4):328–35.
26. Mohammadi Oranghi B, Ghadiri F, Aghdasi M, Yaali R. The Effect of Local Indigenous Games on Motor proficiency in Elementary School Boys in Tehran with High and Low Emotional Intelligence. Mot Behav. 2019;under press. (In persian)
27. Mohammadi Oranghi B, Ghadiri F, Mohammadnejad M. The effect of aerobic rhythmic exercise on anxiety, motor skill and academic achievement in boys of elementary school children of Tabriz with development coordination disorders. RJMS. 2019; 25 (12):64-7328. (In persian)
28. Aiken1, Adam C, Post JT, Guy F and P. The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. Orig Res Artic. 2012;1:20–9.
29. Côté J, Salmela JH, Russell SJ. The knowledge of high-performance gymnastics coaches: Methodological framework. Sport Psychol. 1995;9:65–75.
30. Jackman PC, Fitzpatrick G, Lane A, Swann C. Exploring bodily sensations experienced during flow states in professional national hunt jockeys: a connecting analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Heal. 2019;11(1):92–105.
31. Vereijken B, Emmerik REA van, Whiting HTA, Newell KM. Free (z) ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. J Mot Behav. 1992;24(1):133–42.
32. Davids K, Araújo D, Hristovski R, Passos P, Chow JY. Ecological dynamics and motor learning design in sport. Ski Acquis Sport Res theory Pract. 2012;112–30.
33. Kawabata M, Mallett C. What is flow? Reconsideration of the state of optimal functioning beyond flow theory. In R. Schinke, K. McGannon and B. Smith (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp.369-377). London: Routledge. 2016;

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 October 2020