پژوهش در مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی

تاثیر سن نسبی و سن تقویمی بر تواناییهای حرکتی دانش آموزان 7 تا 12 سال

مقالات آماده انتشار

نویسندگان

حبیب اله حامدیان
مهدی نمازی زاده
صادق نصری
سید محمدکاظم واعظ موسوی
پروانه شمسی پور دهکردی
چکیده
هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی اثر سن نسبی وسن تقویمی بر توانایی‌های حرکتی دانش‌آموزان 7تا12سالبود. براین‌اساس تعداد 600 دانش آموز دختر و پسر 12-7سال در سه رده سنی 8-7سال، 10-9 سال و 12-11سال انتخاب شدند. برای تعیین سن نسبی، تاریختولدتمامیشرکت‌کنندگانجمع‌آوریشد.سپسماه‌هایتولدآنهاتعیین و سن دقیق نمونه‌ها برحسب روز محاسبه و به ماه و سال تبدیل شد. درنهایت جهت ارزیابی توانایی حرکتی از آزمون توانایی حرکتی (DMT) استفادهشد. نتایج نشان داد اثر اصلی سن تقویمی ومتغیر توانایی‌های حرکتی معنادار بود. مقایسه میانگین‌ها نشان داد دانش‌آموزان رده سنی 12-11سال دارای میانگین توانایی حرکتی بالاتری نسبت‌به دانش‌آموزان دختر و پسر رده‌های سنی دیگر داشتند. همچنین اثر اصلی سن نسبیتوانایی‌های حرکتی معنادار بود. مقایسه میانگین‌ها نشان داد دانش‌آموزان دختر و پسر متولد‌شده در چارک‌های اول و دوم سال دارای میانگین توانایی حرکتی بالاتری نسبت به چارک‌های سوم و چهارم می‌باشند. نتایج نشان داد اثر تعاملی سن نسبی درسن تقویمی نیز معنادار بود. لذا دانش‌آموزان دختر برای هریک از رده‌های سنی 8-7سال، 10-9سال و 12-11سال در چارک‌های اول و دوم سال بالاترین نمره توانایی حرکتی و دانش‌آموزان دختر در رده‌های سنی 8-7سال، 10-9سال و 12-11سال در چارک چهارم دارای پایین‌ترین نمره توانایی حرکتی می‌باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سن نسبی
دانش آموزان
توانایی حرکتی
سن تقویمی

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of relative and chronological ages on the motor abilities of 7 to 12 year old students

نویسندگان English

habib allah hamedyan
mahdi namazi zadeh
sadegh nasri
seyed mohannad kazem vaez musavi
parvaneh Shamsi pour dehkordi
چکیده English

The effect of relative and chronological ages on the motor abilities of 7 to 12 year old students

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of relative and chronological age on the motor abilities of students aged 7-12 years. 600 male and female students were selected in three age categories: 7-8 years, 9-10 years, and 11-12 years. To determine the relative age, the date of birth was collected. Then, the months of their birth were determined and it was converted into months and years. The motor ability test was used to assess motor ability. Results showed that the chronological age was significant for the variable of motor abilities. Also, the relative age was significant for the variable of motor abilities. Comparison of means showed that the students born in the first and second quarters have a higher mean motor ability than students born in the third and fourth quarters. Also, students born in the fourth quarter have the lowest average motor ability. Results showed that the relative age on chronological age was significant. Therefore, female students for each of the age groups in the first and second quarters of the year have the highest score of motor ability, and female students in the age groups of 7-8 years, 9-10 years.

Keywords: Relative age, Students, Motor Ability, Chronological Age

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Students
childrens
motor ability
physical maturation level
1. Aune Tore K., Ingvaldsen Rolf P., Vestheim Ole P., Bjerkeset Ottar, Terje D. Relative Age Effects and Gender Differences in the National Test of Numeracy: A Population Study of Norwegian Children Frontiers in Psychology,2018, 9, 1-9.
2. Baker J, Janning C, Wong H, Cobley S, Schorer J. Variations in relative age effects in individual sports: Skiing, figure skating and gymnastics. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014; 14: 183–190.
3. Bös, K., Worth A., Opper E., Oberger J., Romahn N., Wagner M., Jekauc D., Mess F., Woll A. Das Motorik-Modul: Motorische Leistungsfähigkeit und Körperlich-sportliche Aktivität von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. [The Motoric-module: Motor Performance Ability and Physical Activity of Children and Adolescent in Germany.] Nomos-Verlag, Baden-Baden. 2009.
4. Buffalo, N, Y. (2006): physical activity in children linked to motor ability. Burns, Y. R., Danks, M., O’Callaghan, M. J., Gray, P. H., Cooper, D., Poulsen, L.,. Watter, P. Motor coordination difficulties and physical fitness of extremely- low-birthweight children. DevelopmentalMedicine and Child Neurology, 2009, 51, 136–142.
5. Cobley s, baker j, wattie n, mckenna j. Annual age-grouping and athlete development. A meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sports. Sports med. 2009; 39: 235–256.
6. Cupeiro R, Rojo-Tirado MA, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Artero EG, Peinado AB, Labayen I, Dorado C, Arias-Palencia NM, Moliner-Urdiales D, Vidal-Conti J, Conde-Caveda J, Mora-Gonzalez J, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Benito PJ; PREFIT project group. The relative age effect on physical fitness in preschool children. J Sports Sci.2020,38(13): 1506-1515.
7. Delen t, rolf petter1; roaas, truls valland1; pedersen, arve vorland2; steen, ingebrigt1 & aune, tore kristian. 2016. European journal of sport scienc. 1746-1391 (print) 1536-7290 (online): 1-6 t. Dalen et al.
8. Delorme n, raspaud m. The relative age effect in young french basketball players: a study on the whole population. Scand j med sci sports 2009: 19: 235–242.
9. Dutill, caroline , influence of the relative age effect on children’s scores obtained
from the canadian assessment of physical literacy,2017, caroline dutil, ottawa, canada.
10. Fumarco L., Gibbs B., Jarvis J., Rossi, G. The relative age effect reversal among NHL elite. 2016, 13(18): 1-29.
11. García-Hermoso A., Ezzatvar Y., Ramírez-Vélez R., Olloquequi J., Izquierdo M. Is device-measured vigorous-intensity physical activity associated with health-related outcomes in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2020, 12.001.
12. Gavin r.h. Sandercock,1 matthew j. Taylor,1 christine voss,2 ayodele a. Ogunleye,1 daniel d. Cohen,3 and david a. Parry1. Quantification of the relative age effect in three indices of physical performance. Journal of strength and conditioning research ,2013, 27(12)/3293–3299.
13. Helsen WF, van Winckel J, Williams AM. The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe. J Sports Sci. 2005, 23: 629–636.
14. Janssen, I., & Leblanc, A. G. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2010, 7, 40.
15. Kretschmer J. Beweismangel für Bewegungsmangel. Untersuchungen zur motorischen Leistungsfähigkeit von Grundschülern. Teil 2: Deutungen und Reaktionen. sportpädagogik, 2003b , 27 (6), 42-45.
16. Kretschmer, J., Saunders, J., Bressan, L., Erhorn, J., Wirzing, D. (2012). The Motor ability of 8 and 9 Years Old Primary School Children in Germany, Austria and South Africa- A Cross- culture Study. International Journal of Physical Education. Meyer & Meyer.
17. Lames m, augste c, dreckmann c, go ¨rsdorf k, schimanski m. Der „relative age effect”(rae): neue hausaufgaben fu¨r den sport („relativ age effect”(rae): new homework for the sport). Leistungssport. 2008; 37:4–9.
18. Malina, R. M. Top 10 research questions related to growth and maturation of relevance to physical activity, performance, and fitness. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2014, 85(2), 157–173.
19. Malina, R. M., Bouchard, C., & Bar-Or, O. (2004). Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
20. Mu¨ller L , Gonaus CH , Perner CH , Mu¨ller E , Raschner CH. Maturity status influences the relative age effect in national top level youth alpine ski racing and soccer. Plos one. 2017;12(7);1-12.
21. Mu¨ller L, Mu¨ller E, Hildebrandt C, Raschner C. Biological Maturity Status Strongly Intensifies the Relative Age Effect in Alpine Ski Racing. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0160969.
22. Musch j, grondin s. Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: a review of the relative age e"ect in sport. Dev rev 2001;21:147-67.
23. Namazizadeh, M., & Shams, A. Life span motor development. Sport Science Research Institute Publication. 2020. In Persian
24. Navarro-Patón, R., Mecías-Calvo, M., Rodríguez Fernández, J. E., & Arufe-Giráldez, V. Relative Age Effect on Motor Competence in Children Aged 4-5 Years. Children (Basel, Switzerland), (2021), 8(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8020115.
25. Osama AM , Hökelmann A, Bös K. Motor and Cognitive Development of Selected Egyptian and German Primary School Aged Children A Cross-Cultural Study. otto von guericke universitat Magdeburg: fakultät für humanwissenschaften. 2013; 1-133.
26. Peña-González I., Fernández-Fernández J., Moya-Ramón M., Cervelló E. Relative Age Effect, Biological Maturation, and Coaches’ Efficacy Expectations in Young Male Soccer Players, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2018: 89:3, 373-379
27. Rongen, F., McKenna, J., Cobley, S. et al. (2018). Are youth sport talent identification and development systems necessary and healthy?. Sports Med - Open 4, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0135-2.
28. Salami S, Shams A, Shamsipour Dehkordi P. Psychometric Properties (Validity and Reliability) of the Body Coordination Test for Children (KTK) among 5-14 years' children in Tehran City: Persian Version.Motor Behavior. 2020, 11 (38): 71-96. (In Persian).
29. Shams A., Hardy L.L., Vameghi R., Loovis E.M., Shamsipour Dehkordi P. Prevalence of fundamental movement skill proficiency among Iranian children aged 2.5–14 years, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2021, 24(1), 74-79.
30. Sherar, adam d. G. Baxter-jones, robert a. Faulkner, & keith w. Russell . Do physical maturity and birth date predict talent in male youth ice hockey players? .journal of sports sciences, (2007). 25(8): 879 – 886.
31. Simon j. Roberts, lynne m. Boddy, stuart j. Fairclough, and stratton g. The influence of relative age effects on the cardiorespiratory fitness levels of children age 9 to 10 and 11 to 12 years of age.Pediatric exercise science, 2012, 24, 72-83.
32. Strong, W. B., Malina, R. M., Blimkie, C. J. R., Daniels, S. R., Dishman, R. K., Gutin, B., Trudeau, F. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. The Journal of Pediatrics, 2005, 146, 732–737.
33. Wattie N, Cobley S, Baker J. Towards a Unified Understanding of Relative Age Effects. J Sports Sci. 2008; 26: 1403–1409
34. Williams A.M., Ford P.. & Drust B. Talent identification and development in soccer since the millennium, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2020, 38:11-12, 1199-1210.
پژوهش در مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 01 آبان 1399