Volume 15, Issue 30 (12-2025)
JRSM 2025, 15(30): 122-147 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Farzan moghadam F, Norouzi Seyed Hossini R, Mostahfezian M. Factors Determining The Enhancement Of Brand Equity In Private Sports Clubs: An Analysis Of Causal Relationships Using ISM. JRSM 2025; 15 (30) :122-147
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3374-en.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3374-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Associate Professor of Sport Management ,Tarbaiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ,rasool.norouzi@modares.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor of Sport Management, Sport medicine research center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
2- Associate Professor of Sport Management ,Tarbaiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ,
3- Associate Professor of Sport Management, Sport medicine research center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Abstract: (2661 Views)
Aim: To remain competitive in the sports industry, enhancing brand equity has become a crucial issue for private sports clubs. Accordingly, understanding the causal relationships of the determinants of enhancing brand equity in private sports clubs is essential.
Methods: The method of this research is mixed (qualitative and quantitative). In the qualitative section, the research strategy is grounded theory with an emerging approach, and in the quantitative section, it is interpretive structural modeling. The participants in this research consisted of experts in the field of marketing and sports marketing. A purposive sampling method was used for sampling, and based on this, 15 people were selected. The data collection tool in the qualitative section was a semi-structured interview, and in the quantitative section, it was a 10×10 square matrix. The qualitative data were analyzed with three stages of open, selective, and theoretical coding, and the quantitative data were analyzed with the interpretive structural modeling method and MICMAC analysis.
Result: The findings showed 10 general determinants related to enhancing brand equity in private sports clubs.
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that enhancing brand equity in private sports clubs is a complex and multidimensional process, shaped by multiple factors operating at different levels. To effectively strengthen their brand equity, clubs must adopt a comprehensive approach that considers these factors and develop appropriate strategies tailored to each of them.
Methods: The method of this research is mixed (qualitative and quantitative). In the qualitative section, the research strategy is grounded theory with an emerging approach, and in the quantitative section, it is interpretive structural modeling. The participants in this research consisted of experts in the field of marketing and sports marketing. A purposive sampling method was used for sampling, and based on this, 15 people were selected. The data collection tool in the qualitative section was a semi-structured interview, and in the quantitative section, it was a 10×10 square matrix. The qualitative data were analyzed with three stages of open, selective, and theoretical coding, and the quantitative data were analyzed with the interpretive structural modeling method and MICMAC analysis.
Result: The findings showed 10 general determinants related to enhancing brand equity in private sports clubs.
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that enhancing brand equity in private sports clubs is a complex and multidimensional process, shaped by multiple factors operating at different levels. To effectively strengthen their brand equity, clubs must adopt a comprehensive approach that considers these factors and develop appropriate strategies tailored to each of them.
Keywords: Brand Equity, Private Sports Clubs, Customer Mindset, Interpretive Structural Model, Grounded Theory.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
sport management
Received: 2024/09/18 | Accepted: 2025/06/1 | ePublished ahead of print: 2025/06/1 | Published: 2025/12/31
Received: 2024/09/18 | Accepted: 2025/06/1 | ePublished ahead of print: 2025/06/1 | Published: 2025/12/31
References
1. Ahmadvand, F., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Investigating the effect of brand equity on consumer responses. Business Strategies, 12(2), 63-78.
2. Emami, M., Nazari, S., & Nouroozi Seydhosseyni, R. (2022). The effect of brand personality on brand equity with the mediating role of brand authenticity in consumers of Majid brand sports products. Scientific Quarterly of Brand Management, 9(4), 241-287. doi :10.22051/bmr.2023.40270.2338
3. Alagarsamy, S., Mehrolia, S., & Paul, J. (2024). Masstige scale: An alternative to measure brand equity. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1), 1-14. [DOI:10.1111/ijcs.12873]
4. Aripin, Z., & Agusiady, R. (2024). Strategies for maintaining customer satisfaction post product recall: Synergy of settlement, brand equity, and level of severity. Journal of Economics, Accounting, Business, Management, Engineering and Society, 1(3), 63-77.
5. Etumnu, C., & Volpe, R. (2024). Measuring brand equity on Amazon.com: The case of Starbucks. Journal of Food Distribution Research (Forthcoming), 1-26.
6. Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Ang, S. H., Tan, C. T., & Leong, S. M. (2018). Marketing management: An Asian perspective (7th ed.). Pearson. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/137
7. Krasa, P., Gorbaniuk, O., Kolańska-Stronka, M., Czarnecka, K., Czyż, K., Karski, T., & Synowiec, D. (2023). The impact of self-esteem on the perceived brand added value to self-image. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 64(2), 99-115. [DOI:10.24425/ppb.2023.146404]
8. Mooduto, S., Bempah, I., & Saleh, Y. (2024). Analisis strategi pemasaran kopi Gorontalo di CV. Ameer Essoya Natura Kecamatan Sipatana Kota Gorontalo. Economics and Digital Business Review, 5(1), 284-297.
9. Vo, T. Q., & Nguyen-Anh, T. (2024). Corporate social marketing and brand equity-A case of dairy products in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2321795. [DOI:10.1080/23311975.2024.2321795]
10. Ansary, A., & Hashim, N. M. H. N. (2018). Brand image and equity: The mediating role of brand equity drivers and moderating effects of product type and word of mouth. Review of Managerial Science, 12(4), 969-1002. [DOI:10.1007/s11846-017-0235-2]
11. Jaberi, A., Asadi, S. N., Asadi, H., & Khabiri, M. (2020). The effect of the elements of the need for self-improvement on the brand value of Premier League football clubs. Sports Management, 12(4), 601-620. [DOI:10.22059/jsm.2021.113748.1266]
12. Jahromi, Naderian, Shahamat Nashtifani and Rasaee Rad. (2023). Explaining and Analyzing the Relationship between Brand Equity and Team Social Responsibility: Emphasizing the Mediating Role of Social Identity, Journal of Strategic Sociological Studies in Sport Vol 3, Issue 4, Winter 2023. Serial No 9. 435-448. https://doi.org/ 10.30486/4s.2023.1988407.1131 [DOI:10.30486/4s.2023.1988407.1131]
13. Lotfi, R., Reza, A., & Kaffashpoor, M. (2023). Investigating the effect of corporate factors affecting brand equity. The Second International Conference on Economics and Business Management.
14. Eghbali, K., Rasaeirad, A., & Rezaei, Z. (2022). Explaining the special value model of the sports team brand from the perspective of the dual identity related to the team based on sports market values and symbolic stimuli. Sociological and Managerial Analyses in Sports, 1(1), 1-26.
15. Bensberdi, A., Khabiri, M., Jalali Farahani, M., & Ghorzi, M. (2015). Identifying the factors affecting the brand development of Premier League football clubs. Strategic Studies of Sport and Youth, 14(27), 147-158. https://www.magiran.com/p1455601
16. Sajadi, S. N., Rajabi Nosh Abadi, H., Abedlati, M., & Tarighi, R. (2016). Identifying the factors affecting the brand equity of professional football teams Case study: Esteghlal Tehran Club. Sport Management Studies (Research in Sports Science), 8(39), 87-102. [DOI:10.22089/smrj.2016.867]
17. Sreejesh, S. (2024). Integrated banking channel service quality (IBCSQ): Role of IBCSQ for building consumers' relationship quality and brand equity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103616. [DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103616]
18. Wang, X., You, X., Xu, Y., & Zheng, J. (2024). Online posting intention: Do the social communication and brand equity of esports matter? International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 25(1), 161-187. [DOI:10.1108/IJSMS-09-2023-0189]
19. Fathiya, S., Aulya, A. S., & Arafah, W. (2024). Konsekuensi dari ethical behaviour dan trust pada industri sport brand di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 4067-4074. [DOI:10.31004/jptam.v8i1.13016]
20. Ahiabor, D. K., Kosiba, J. P. B., Gli, D. D., Tweneboah-Koduah, E. Y., & Hinson, R. E. (2023). Satellite fans engagement with social networking sites influence on sport team brand equity: A UGT perspective. Digital Business, 3(2), 100064. [DOI:10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100064]
21. Habibi, A., & Afaridy, S. (2022). Multi-indicator decision making. Naron Publications.
22. Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740-759. [DOI:10.1287/mksc.1050.0153]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
