Volume 7, Issue 13 (4-2017)                   JRSM 2017, 7(13): 45-53 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Abstract:   (4778 Views)
Tools and methods that could lead to the recognition and motion analysis variables are helpful in understanding the movements and movement Sciences and It will be a vital part of movement and sport sciences laboratories. "Human motion analysis instrument based on joints angles in sagittal plane" was designed to provide information about the motion analysis that offers to researchers, educators and therapists. Once the instrument has been built according to the design of specialized electronic and mechanical engineers, tested until the fourth final design was made and it was registered on 21.05.1393 with number 83557. To check the validity, with using of motion analysis system with optoelectronic cameras and the instrument, 20 participants (10 males and 10 females) were asked to perform a throwing task. The root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson correlation in the statistical 0.01 were used to assess the reliability and validity. The results indicate that the instrument is made applicable and appropriate validity and reliability so that the validity: 0.98 and reliability: 0.95 was reported.
Full-Text [PDF 1044 kb]   (1973 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: motor behavior
Received: 2015/01/6 | Accepted: 2015/12/13 | Published: 2017/08/23

References
1. Schmidt, R.A. and T. Lee, Motor Control and Learning. 2005: Human kinetics.
2. Schmidt, R.A. and C.A. Wrisberg, Motor learning and performance. 2004.
3. Enoka, R.M., Neuromechanics of human movement. 2008: Human kinetics.
4. Dun, S., et al., Biomechanical comparison of the fastball from wind-up and the fastball from stretch in professional baseball pitchers. The American journal of sports medicine, 2008. 36(1): p. 137-141.
5. Winter, D.A., Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2009: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Bartlett, R., Introduction to sports biomechanics. 1997: Taylor & Francis.
7. Kageyama, M., et al., Difference Between Adolescent and Collegiate Baseball Pitchers in the Kinematics and Kinetics of the Lower Limbs and Trunk During Pitching Motion. Journal of sports science & medicine, 2015. 14(2): p. 246.
8. Smajlović, N., et al., The Structure of Running Kinematic Parameters Related to Different Quality Groups of Boys aged 10-12. Volume 15–Issue 2–December, 2013, 2013: p. 4.
9. Sachlikidis, A. and C. Salter, A biomechanical comparison of dominant and non-dominant arm throws for speed and accuracy. Sports Biomechanics, 2007. 6(3): p. 334-344.
10. Huang, P.-C., et al., Motion analysis of throwing Boccia balls in children with cerebral palsy. Research in developmental disabilities, 2014. 35(2 :(p. 393-399.
11. Sasakawa, K. and S. Sakurai, Biomechanical analysis of the sidearm throwing motion for distance of a flying disc: A comparison of skilled and unskilled Ultimate players. Sports Biomechanics, 2008. 7(3): p. 311-321.
12. Latash, M.L., Fundamentals of motor control. 2012: Academic Press.
13. Rosenbaum, D.A., Human motor control. 2009: Academic Press.
14. Davids, K., et al., Complex Systems in Sport. Vol. 7. 2013: Routledge.
15. Shumway-Cook, A. and M.H. Woollacott, Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 2007: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
16. Edwards, W., (2010). Motor learning and control: From theory to practice, Cengage Learning.
17. Rose, D.J. and R.W. Christina, (1997). A multilevel approach to the study of motor control and learning, Allyn and Bacon Boston.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.