Volume 10, Issue 19 (8-2020)
JRSM 2020, 10(19): 163-179 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aghdasi M T, Behzadnia B. Comparison of Orientations to Activities on Exercise Self-efficacy and Indices of Well-being among Physically-motion Disables. JRSM 2020; 10 (19) :163-179
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2452-en.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2452-en.html
1- Tabriz University
2- Tabriz University , behzadniaa@gmail.com
2- Tabriz University , behzadniaa@gmail.com
Abstract: (3259 Views)
This study examined the comparison of exercise self-efficacy and indices of well-being based on different orientations to activities among physically-motion disables and veterans. 123 physically-motion disables and veterans filled the questionnaires of exercise self-efficacy, hedonia and eudemonia motives for activities, positive and negative affect and subjective vitality.The results showed that only eudemonia motive positively associated with positive affect and vitality. Exercise self-efficacy positively associated with eudemonic well-being. There were significant differences between different orientation to activities on positive affect and vitality. People whose lives were high in eudemonia had higher degrees of positive affect and vitality than people whose lives in the lower degree of both hedonia and eudemonia (empty life). Also, people whose lives were in both high eudemonia and hedonia (full life) had the higher degree of positive affect than people whose lives in empty life.The finding show of crucial role of eudemonia on well-being among physically-motion disables and veterans, and the combination of hedonia and eudemonia may be associated with optimal well-being.
Keywords: Eudemonia, Hedonia, Exercise Self-Efficacy, Self-Determination Theory, Physically-Motion Disables and Veterans
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
motor behavior
Received: 2017/03/14 | Accepted: 2018/07/1 | Published: 2020/08/31
Received: 2017/03/14 | Accepted: 2018/07/1 | Published: 2020/08/31
References
1. Boslaugh SE, Andresen EM. Peer reviewed: Correlates of physical activity for adults with disability. Preventing chronic disease. 2006 Jul;3(3). A78.
2. Rimmer JH, Rubin SS, Braddock DA, Hedman GL. Physical activity patterns of African-American women with physical disabilities. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 1999 Apr 1;31(4):613-8. [DOI:10.1097/00005768-199904000-00020]
3. Lannem AM, Sørensen M, Frøslie KF, Hjeltnes N. Incomplete spinal cord injury, exercise and life satisfaction. Spinal Cord. 2009 Apr;47(4):295-300. [DOI:10.1038/sc.2008.117]
4. Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology. 2001 Feb;52(1):141-66. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141]
5. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N, editors. Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation; 1999 Jul 8.
6. Aghaee A, Shariatpanahi A, Banijamali Sh, Azad P, Ahadi H, Shahidi, Sh, … & Atef MK. (Trans). APA dictionary of psychology. 2012 P: 1525.
7. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1989 Dec;57(6):1069-81. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069]
8. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(4), 678-91. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678]
9. Huta V, Ryan RM. Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of happiness studies. 2010 Dec 1;11(6):735-62. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4]
10. Huta V. Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In AS Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia. Washington DC: American Psychological Association 2013. [DOI:10.1037/14092-008]
11. Ryff CD. Eudaimonic well-being and health: mapping consequences of self-realization. In AS Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 77-98). Washington DC: American Psychological Association 2013. [DOI:10.1037/14092-005]
12. Huta V, Waterman AS. Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2014 Dec 1;15(6):1425-56. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0]
13. Peterson C, Park N, Seligman ME. Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of happiness studies. 2005 Mar 1;6(1):25-41. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z]
14. Ryan RM, Huta V. Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking (response to the Kashdan et al. and Waterman discussion). The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2009 May 1;4(3):202-4. [DOI:10.1080/17439760902844285]
15. Schmutte PS, Ryff CD. Personality and well-being: reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1997 Sep;73(3):549. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549]
16. Keyes CL, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD. Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2002 Jun;82(6):1007. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007]
17. Behzadnia B, Mohammadzade H, Farokhi A, Ghasemnejad R. Effect of participation in aerobic dancing classes on psychological well-being of male students. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2014 16(9), 64-7.
18. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7]
19. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry. 2000 Oct 1;11(4):227-68. [DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01]
20. Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press; 2004.
21. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications; 2017 Feb 14. [DOI:10.1521/978.14625/28806]
22. Mack DE, Gunnell KE, Wilson PM, Gilchrist JD, Kowalski KC, Crocker PR, Ferguson L, Adachi JD. Physical activity in individuals living with osteopenia: Associations with psychological need satisfaction and motives for well-being. The Shield-Research Journal of Physical Education & Sports Science.. 2011 Dec 10(6):26-41.
23. Ryan RM, Huta V, Deci EL. Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of happiness studies. 2008 Jan 1;9(1):139-70. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4]
24. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68]
25. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology. 2000 Jan 1;25(1):54-67. [DOI:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020]
26. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan. 1997.
27. Soysa CK, Wilcomb CJ. Mindfulness, self-compassion, self-efficacy, and gender as predictors of depression, anxiety, stress, and well-being. Mindfulness. 2015 Apr 1;6(2):217-26. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-013-0247-1]
28. Fox KR. The influence of physical activity on mental well-being. Public health nutrition. 1999 Mar;2(3a):411-8. [DOI:10.1017/S1368980099000567]
29. Martin JJ, Prokesova E, Atkinson F. The psychology of wheelchair sport from hedonic to eudaimonic happiness. In KR Henderson (Eds.), Wheelchairs: Perceptions, Technology Advances and Barriers (pp. 88-99). Nova Science Publisher. 2017.
30. Martin JJ. Exercise psychology and physical disabilities. In EO Acevedo (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Exercise Psychology (pp. 337-358). Oxford University Press. 2012.
31. Malone LA, Barfield JP, Brasher JD. Perceived benefits and barriers to exercise among persons with physical disabilities or chronic health conditions within action or maintenance stages of exercise. Disability and Health Journal. 2012 Oct 1;5(4):254-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.05.004]
32. JalaliFarahani M. Principles, foundations, and goals of sports for disables. Institute of Physical Education and Sport Science, Tehran 2011.
33. Behzadnia B, Ryan RM. Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations in physical education and their relation with motivation and wellness. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2018;49(5):363-85.
34. Diener E, Emmons RA. The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1984 Nov;47(5):1105-17. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105]
35. Aghdasi MT, Behzadnia B. Predicting psychological needs and well-being of athlete Students: The role of coaches. Sport Psychology Studies. 2016 Jan 1;5(16):1-8.
36. Ryan RM, Frederick C. On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. Journal of personality. 1997 Sep;65(3):529-65. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x]
37. Behzadnia B, Ahmadi M, Keshtidar M. The relationship between perceptions of parent autonomy-supportive with indices of well-being in athlete male students: A self-determination theory approach. Research on University Sports Journal, 2013 Jul 15;1(3):93-108.
38. McAuley E, Courneya KS, Lettunich J. Effects of acute and long-term exercise on self-efficacy responses in sedentary, middle-aged males and females. The gerontologist. 1991 Aug 1;31(4):534-42. [DOI:10.1093/geront/31.4.534]
39. Ahmadi M, Zadeh MN, Behzadnia B. The relationship between Basic psychological needs and indices of well-being (Eudaimonia and Hedonia) in physical activity of motional-physical disabled individuals. Sport Psychology Studies. 2014;2(6):95-104.
40. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In EL Deci, RM Ryan (Eds.) Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester. 2002:3-3.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
