Volume 10, Issue 20 (11-2020)
JRSM 2020, 10(20): 174-202 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Baran Cheshmeh M A, Safania A M, Bagherian Farahabadi M, Naqshbandi S. Compilation Framework of Sport Diplomacy Development in Islamic Republic of Iran Armed Forces. JRSM 2020; 10 (20) :174-202
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2929-en.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2929-en.html
Mehr Ali Baran Cheshmeh1 
, Ali Mohammad Safania 2, Mohsen Bagherian Farahabadi1 , Salahdin Naqshbandi1
, Ali Mohammad Safania 2, Mohsen Bagherian Farahabadi1 , Salahdin Naqshbandi1
1- Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch
2- Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch ,a.m.safania@gmail.com
2- Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch ,
Abstract: (3656 Views)
Nowadays, sport provides an opportunity for friendly cooperation among different countries which is based on contribution of all nations and individuals in the natural form of sport. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compile a framework of sport diplomacy in Islamic Republic of Iran armed forces. The methodology of present study is Grounded Theory (GT) having qualitative approach which is applied in terms of purpose using semi-structured interviews for data collection. Participants in this study included officials of Ministry of Sport and Youth, the National Olympic and Paralympic Committee, sport federations, sport science professors, foreign ministry experts and great managers of armed forces who aware of sport and public diplomacy which 21 of whom were selected through purposeful sampling. The tool of this research was semi-structured interviews that continued until theoretical saturation stage. The reliability and validity of findings were determined by dependability, reliability and generalizability. Grounded theory qualitative approach was used to analyze the data for open, axial and selective coding. Based on the results, 128 initial conceptual propositions with 31 main categories in six dimensions of paradigm model were identified including causal conditions (5 main concepts), contextual factors (6 main concepts), confounding factors (6 main concepts), strategies (7 main concepts) and the consequences (7 main concepts). The proposed theory was also defined as "Increase the importance of development of military sports diplomacy as a tool for strengthening military diplomacy in other areas of the armed forces' mission and, consequently, the development of public diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran". Finally, it is suggested that the Islamic Republic of Iran Armed Forces pay special attention to sports diplomacy in order to strengthen their mission areas.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
sport management
Received: 2019/12/31 | Accepted: 2020/02/23 | ePublished ahead of print: 2020/10/24 | Published: 2020/11/30
Received: 2019/12/31 | Accepted: 2020/02/23 | ePublished ahead of print: 2020/10/24 | Published: 2020/11/30
References
1. 1. Rooney, P. Sport for Development and Peace: the case of Northern Ireland. NUI Galway. 2012;1-69.
2. Nik Ain, E. Assessing the Impact of Media on the Nature of Iranian Man. Psychological Operations Studies. 2009; No. 23 (Persian).
3. Sabilan Ardestani, H. Psychological Operations and Media Diplomacy. Psychological Operations Studies. 2004; No. 7. (Persian).
4. Ghorbani, N. Investigating the Challenges of Iranian Public Diplomacy in the Persian Gulf Region (Case Study: Bahrain and Iraq). Thesis, Faculty of Law and Political Science. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. 1391 (Persian).
5. Shariati, M., Goodarzi, M. Structural Modeling (SEM) of Sports Diplomacy Components in the Development of International Relations of the Islamic Republic of Iran. New Approaches in Sports Management. 2017; 5;16. (Persian).
6. Murray S. The two halves of sports-diplomacy. Diplomacy & statecraft. 2012 Sep 1;23(3):576-92. [DOI:10.1080/09592296.2012.706544]
7. Nicholson M, Hoye R, Houlihan B, editors. Participation in sport: International policy perspectives. Routledge; 2010 Sep 6. [DOI:10.4324/9780203870495]
8. Baran Cheshmeh, M. A. Introduction to the International Military Sports Council (SEISM). NAJA Deputy for Education and Training Publications. 2014; First Edition. (Persian).
9. Ghadami, M., Mostafavi, H. Presenting the operational model of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Cultural Management. 2009; 5(3), 61-83. (Persian).
10. Yani DR. SPORTS DIPLOMACY AS THE ALTERNATIVE OF RECONCILIATION FOR SOUTH KOREA-NORTH KOREA AND THE PROSPECT OF REUNIFICATION.
11. Côme T, Raspaud M. Sports diplomacy: A strategic challenge for Qatar. Hermès, La Revue. 2018(2):169-75. [DOI:10.3917/herm.081.0169]
12. Bazargan, A. Introduction to Qualitative and Mixed Methods: Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences. Didar Publishing. 1389; Second Edition. (Persian).
13. Peymanfar, M. H, Elahi; A R, Sajjadpour, MK, Hamidi, M. Explaining Sports Diplomacy Using a Paradigm Model: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Sports Management. 2019; 11;1, 59-75. (Persian).
14. Grix J, Houlihan B. Sports mega-events as part of a nation's soft power strategy: The cases of Germany (2006) and the UK (2012). The British journal of politics and international relations. 2014 Nov;16(4):572-96. [DOI:10.1111/1467-856X.12017]
15. Porteux JN, Choi KJ. Hallyu as sports diplomacy and prestige building. Culture and Empathy. 2018;1(1-4):70-87. [DOI:10.32860/26356619/2018/1.1234.0006]
16. Dubinsky Y. From soft power to sports diplomacy: A theoretical and conceptual discussion. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 2019 Sep 1;15(3):156-64. [DOI:10.1057/s41254-019-00116-8]
17. Mahanta, K., & Deshpande, M. Sports Diplomacy and International relation: A case study of India. journal of Politics & International Relations. 2019; 12(8), 36-57
18. Park MK. Long Shot: The Prospects and Limitations of Sports and Celebrity Athlete Diplomacy. InMedia. The French Journal of Media Studies. 2017 Dec 19(6). [DOI:10.4000/inmedia.855]
19. Jankovic S. Enhancing international dispute settlement: the role of sports diplomacy. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy. 2017;3(3):264-78. [DOI:10.1504/IJDIPE.2017.10004870]
20. Humphrey J. No holding Brazil: football, nationalism and politics. Off the Ball: The Football World Cup. 1986:127-39.
21. Dauncey H, Hare G, editors. France and the 1998 World Cup: The national impact of a world sporting event. Taylor & Francis US; 1999.
22. Kobierecki MM. Ping-Pong Diplomacy and its Legacy in the American Foreign Policy. Polish Political Science Yearbook. 2016;45(1):304-16. [DOI:10.15804/ppsy2016023]
23. Martynenko SE, Trusova AA, Cherniaev MS. Ping-Pong Diplomacy: Impact on the Establishment of Sino-US Relations. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2019 Dec 15;19(1):139-47. [DOI:10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-139-147]
24. Yazdan Fam, M. Strategic Environment of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Military-Security Issues and Trends. National Security Watch. 2014; 24-25. (Persian).
25. Javadipour, M. J. Investigating the issues and problems of the country's sports diplomacy with emphasis on advancing the goals of cultural-social policies and foreign relations, Basij Studies and Research Institute. Humanities Studies and Research Center. 2015. (Persian).
26. Nazemi, M. Designing an Optimal Model of Iranian Sports Diplomacy. PhD Thesis in Sports Management. Faculty of Physical Education, Islamic Azad University. 2016. (Persian).
27. Jarvie G, Murray S, Macdonald S. Promoting Scotland, diplomacy and influence through sport. Scottish Affairs. 2017 Feb;26(1):1-22. [DOI:10.3366/scot.2017.0161]
28. Siburian EE, Afriansyah A. SPORT DIPLOMACY AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY: CASE STUDY ON INDONESIA'S EFFORT TO GUARD THE SOVEREIGNTY OF PAPUA. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum. 2018 Apr 1;7(1):58-84. [DOI:10.20961/yustisia.v0i0.19696]
29. Hass, J., Grassmann, D. More than a Game - Sport in Foreign Policy ,http://www.ifa.de/en/culture-and-foreign-policy/research-and-dialogue/research programme /more-than-a-game-sport-in-foreign-policy.html. 2014.
30. Yamamoto MY. Development of the sporting nation: sport as a strategic area of national policy in Japan. International journal of sport policy and politics. 2012 Jul 1;4(2):277-96. [DOI:10.1080/19406940.2012.685489]
31. Reiche D. Investing in sporting success as a domestic and foreign policy tool: the case of Qatar. International journal of sport policy and politics. 2015 Oct 2;7(4):489-504. [DOI:10.1080/19406940.2014.966135]
32. Kobierecki MM. The commonwealth games as an example of bringing states closer through sport. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research. 2017 Mar 1;73(1):36-43. [DOI:10.1515/pcssr-2017-0004]
33. Ushkovska M, Petrushevska T. Sports Diplomacy: Development and Practice. Research in Kinesiology. 2015 Jun 1;43(1):89-93.
34. Asad Beigi, M., Vahidi, H. Evaluating the Effect of Knowledge Creation on Competitive Advantage in Karafarin Bank. Smart Business Management Studies. 1392; 6 (Persian).
35. de-San-Eugenio J, Ginesta X, Xifra J. Peace, sports diplomacy and corporate social responsibility: A case study of Football Club Barcelona Peace Tour 2013. Soccer & Society. 2017 Nov 10;18(7):836-48. [DOI:10.1080/14660970.2015.1067796]
36. Sabbaghian, A. Sports Diplomacy. Cultural Studies & Communication. 2015; No. 63 (Persian).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
